/*
* Jalview - A Sequence Alignment Editor and Viewer ($$Version-Rel$$)
* Copyright (C) $$Year-Rel$$ The Jalview Authors
*
* This file is part of Jalview.
*
* Jalview is free software: you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3
* of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* Jalview is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty
* of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
* PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with Jalview. If not, see .
* The Jalview Authors are detailed in the 'AUTHORS' file.
*/
package jalview.util;
import static org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals;
import static org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertTrue;
import jalview.gui.JvOptionPane;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Random;
import org.testng.annotations.BeforeClass;
import org.testng.annotations.Test;
public class QuickSortTest
{
@BeforeClass(alwaysRun = true)
public void setUpJvOptionPane()
{
JvOptionPane.setInteractiveMode(false);
JvOptionPane.setMockResponse(JvOptionPane.CANCEL_OPTION);
}
private static final String c1 = "Blue";
private static final String c2 = "Yellow";
private static final String c3 = "Orange";
private static final String c4 = "Green";
private static final String c5 = "Pink";
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testSort_byIntValues()
{
int[] values = new int[] { 3, 0, 4, 3, -1 };
Object[] things = new Object[] { c1, c2, c3, c4, c5 };
QuickSort.sort(values, things);
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new int[] { -1, 0, 3, 3, 4 }, values));
// note sort is not stable: c1/c4 are equal but get reordered
Object[] expect = new Object[] { c5, c2, c4, c1, c3 };
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(expect, things));
}
/**
* Test the alternative sort objects by integer method
*/
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testSortByInt()
{
int[] values = new int[] { 3, 0, 4, 3, -1 };
Object[] things = new Object[] { c1, c2, c3, c4, c5 };
/*
* sort ascending
*/
QuickSort.sortByInt(values, things, true);
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new int[] { -1, 0, 3, 3, 4 }, values));
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new Object[] { c5, c2, c1, c4, c3 }, things));
/*
* resort descending; c1/c4 should not change order
*/
QuickSort.sortByInt(values, things, false);
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new int[] { 4, 3, 3, 0, -1 }, values));
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new Object[] { c3, c1, c4, c2, c5 }, things));
}
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testSort_byFloatValues()
{
float[] values = new float[] { 3f, 0f, 4f, 3f, -1f };
Object[] things = new Object[] { c1, c2, c3, c4, c5 };
QuickSort.sort(values, things);
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new float[] { -1f, 0f, 3f, 3f, 4f }, values));
// note sort is not stable: c1/c4 are equal but get reordered
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new Object[] { c5, c2, c4, c1, c3 }, things));
}
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testSort_byDoubleValues()
{
double[] values = new double[] { 3d, 0d, 4d, 3d, -1d };
Object[] things = new Object[] { c1, c2, c3, c4, c5 };
QuickSort.sort(values, things);
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new double[] { -1d, 0d, 3d, 3d, 4d }, values));
// note sort is not stable: c1/c4 are equal but get reordered
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new Object[] { c5, c2, c4, c1, c3 }, things));
}
/**
* Sort by String is descending order, case-sensitive
*/
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testSort_byStringValues()
{
Object[] things = new Object[] { c1, c2, c3, c4, c5 };
String[] values = new String[] { "JOHN", "henry", "lucy", "henry",
"ALISON" };
QuickSort.sort(values, things);
assertTrue(
Arrays.equals(new String[]
{ "lucy", "henry", "henry", "JOHN", "ALISON" }, values));
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new Object[] { c3, c2, c4, c1, c5 }, things));
}
/**
* Test whether sort is stable i.e. equal values retain their mutual ordering.
*/
@Test(groups = { "Functional" }, enabled = false)
public void testSort_withDuplicates()
{
int[] values = new int[] { 3, 4, 2, 4, 1 };
Object[] letters = new Object[] { "A", "X", "Y", "B", "Z" };
QuickSort.sort(values, letters);
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 4 }, values));
// this fails - do we care?
assertTrue(
Arrays.equals(new Object[]
{ "Z", "Y", "A", "X", "B" }, letters));
}
/**
* Test of method that sorts chars by a float array
*/
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testSort_charSortByFloat_mostlyZeroValues()
{
char[] residues = new char[64];
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
{
residues[i] = (char) i;
}
float[] counts = new float[64];
counts[43] = 16;
counts[59] = 7;
counts[62] = -2;
QuickSort.sort(counts, residues);
assertEquals(62, residues[0]); // negative sorts to front
assertEquals(59, residues[62]); // 7 sorts to next-to-end
assertEquals(43, residues[63]); // 16 sorts to end
}
/**
* Timing test - to be run manually as needed, not part of the automated
* suite.
* It shows that the optimised sort is 3-4 times faster than the simple
* external sort if the data to be sorted is mostly zero, but slightly slower
* if the data is fully populated with non-zero values. Worst case for an
* array of size 256 is about 100 sorts per millisecond.
*/
@Test(groups = { "Timing" }, enabled = false)
public void testSort_timingTest()
{
char[] residues = new char[256];
for (int i = 0; i < residues.length; i++)
{
residues[i] = (char) i;
}
float[] counts = new float[residues.length];
int iterations = 1000000;
/*
* time it using optimised sort (of a mostly zero-filled array)
*/
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
{
Arrays.fill(counts, 0f);
counts[43] = 16;
counts[59] = 7;
counts[62] = -2;
QuickSort.sort(counts, residues);
}
long elapsed = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println(String.format(
"Time for %d optimised sorts of mostly zeros array length %d was %dms",
iterations, counts.length, elapsed));
/*
* time it using unoptimised external sort
*/
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
{
Arrays.fill(counts, 0f);
counts[43] = 16;
counts[59] = 7;
counts[62] = -2;
QuickSort.charSortByFloat(counts, residues, true);
}
elapsed = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println(String.format(
"Time for %d external sorts of mostly zeros array length %d was %dms",
iterations, counts.length, elapsed));
/*
* optimised external sort, well-filled array
*/
Random random = new Random();
float[] randoms = new float[counts.length];
for (int i = 0; i < randoms.length; i++)
{
randoms[i] = random.nextFloat();
}
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
{
System.arraycopy(randoms, 0, counts, 0, randoms.length);
QuickSort.sort(counts, residues);
}
elapsed = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println(String.format(
"Time for %d optimised sorts of non-zeros array length %d was %dms",
iterations, counts.length, elapsed));
/*
* time unoptimised external sort, filled array
*/
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
{
System.arraycopy(randoms, 0, counts, 0, randoms.length);
QuickSort.charSortByFloat(counts, residues, true);
}
elapsed = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println(String.format(
"Time for %d external sorts of non-zeros array length %d was %dms",
iterations, counts.length, elapsed));
}
/**
* Test that exercises sort without any attempt at fancy optimisation
*/
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testCharSortByFloat()
{
char[] residues = new char[64];
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
{
residues[i] = (char) i;
}
float[] counts = new float[64];
counts[43] = 16;
counts[59] = 7;
counts[62] = -2;
/*
* sort ascending
*/
QuickSort.charSortByFloat(counts, residues, true);
assertEquals(62, residues[0]);
assertEquals(59, residues[62]);
assertEquals(43, residues[63]);
/*
* resort descending
*/
QuickSort.charSortByFloat(counts, residues, false);
assertEquals(62, residues[63]);
assertEquals(59, residues[1]);
assertEquals(43, residues[0]);
}
/**
* Test of method that sorts chars by an int array
*/
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testSort_charSortByInt_mostlyZeroValues()
{
char[] residues = new char[64];
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
{
residues[i] = (char) i;
}
int[] counts = new int[64];
counts[43] = 16;
counts[59] = 7;
counts[62] = -2;
QuickSort.sort(counts, residues);
assertEquals(62, residues[0]); // negative sorts to front
assertEquals(59, residues[62]); // 7 sorts to next-to-end
assertEquals(43, residues[63]); // 16 sorts to end
}
/**
* Test that exercises sorting without any attempt at fancy optimisation.
*/
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testCharSortByInt()
{
char[] residues = new char[64];
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
{
residues[i] = (char) i;
}
int[] counts = new int[64];
counts[43] = 16;
counts[59] = 7;
counts[62] = -2;
/*
* sort ascending
*/
QuickSort.charSortByInt(counts, residues, true);
assertEquals(62, residues[0]);
assertEquals(59, residues[62]);
assertEquals(43, residues[63]);
/*
* resort descending
*/
QuickSort.charSortByInt(counts, residues, false);
assertEquals(62, residues[63]);
assertEquals(59, residues[1]);
assertEquals(43, residues[0]);
}
/**
* Tests the alternative method to sort bby String in descending order,
* case-sensitive
*/
@Test(groups = { "Functional" })
public void testSortByString()
{
Object[] things = new Object[] { c1, c2, c3, c4, c5 };
String[] values = new String[] { "JOHN", "henry", "lucy", "henry",
"ALISON" };
/*
* sort descending
*/
QuickSort.sortByString(values, things, false);
assertTrue(
Arrays.equals(new String[]
{ "lucy", "henry", "henry", "JOHN", "ALISON" }, values));
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new Object[] { c3, c2, c4, c1, c5 }, things));
/*
* resort ascending
*/
QuickSort.sortByString(values, things, true);
assertTrue(
Arrays.equals(new String[]
{ "ALISON", "JOHN", "henry", "henry", "lucy" }, values));
// sort is stable: c2/c4 do not swap order
assertTrue(Arrays.equals(new Object[] { c5, c1, c2, c4, c3 }, things));
}
}